A SECRET WEAPON FOR DIFFERENCE BETWEEN EXECUTIVE AND NON EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS CASE LAWS

A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws

A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws

Blog Article

77 . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 of your Constitution based to the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued for the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement within the FIR lodged by FIA and within the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.

Delay in recording confessional statement might not be treated fatal on the case of prosecution(Murder Trial)

Therefore, this petition is found to become not maintainable and is dismissed along with the pending application(s), as well as the petitioners may perhaps seek remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more

The former means “guilty act” plus the latter means “guilty mind.” With the omission on the intention, the commission of the act on your own will not be more than enough to gain a conviction for that crime. This is actually a standard principle that all legislation students are well acquainted with.

Preceding 4 tax years interpreted. It's not from the date of finalisation of audit but from the tax year involved. Read more

The recent amendment to Section 489-File with the Pakistan Penal Code signifies a progressive step towards effectively combatting counterfeiting activities. Through its expanded scope, heightened penalties, and technological considerations, the amendment aligns the legislation with contemporary challenges.

S. Supreme Court. Generally speaking, proper case citation consists of the names in the parties to the initial case, the court in which the case was listened to, the date it was decided, as well here as the book in which it really is recorded. Different citation requirements may possibly include things like italicized or underlined text, and certain specific abbreviations.

A year later, Frank and Adel have a similar problem. When they sue their landlord, the court must use the previous court’s decision in applying the law. This example of case law refers to two cases heard while in the state court, for the same level.

Civil Courts keep jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it calls for legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be developed and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more

This public interest litigation came before the Supreme Court of Pakistan when petitioners challenged the construction of a nearby electricity grid station on account of likely health risks and hazards.

Using keywords effectively is also very important. Look at using synonyms and variations of your keywords to ensure you capture all relevant results. Understanding the citation system used by Pakistani courts will also help you pinpoint specific cases.

She did note that the boy still needed comprehensive therapy in order to manage with his abusive past, and “to get to the point of being Safe and sound with other children.” The boy was getting counseling with a DCFS therapist. Again, the court approved of your actions.

Acquittal nullifies prior guilt and fortifies petitioners' eligibility for appointment. No juridical impediment to appointment following acquittal. Equivalence of acquittals under compromise and criminal procedure code, as well as role of "badal-i-sulh" in restorative justice. Distinction between probationary release and acquittal. Probationary release being a legally identified conviction. Read more

In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials performing within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case legislation previously rendered on similar cases.

Report this page